standarized anomaly
Added by Noelia Otero about 11 years ago
Hi!
I'm trying to calculate standarized anomalies for seasonal values (JAS) in one decade.
My question is:
would it be correct to do something like that:
cdo sub ua200.nc -timmean ua200.nc anom200.nc
cdo div anom200.nc -timstd anom200.nc anom200std.nc
(where ua200.nc is a file the kind of ua_Amon_MRI-CGCM3_decadal1960_r9i1p1_196101-197012_t42_westA_meanJAS.nc)
Because I'm not sure about the second step...
Many thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Noelia Otero
Replies (3)
RE: standarized anomaly - Added by Jaison-Thomas Ambadan about 11 years ago
Hi,
Because I'm not sure about the second step...
I think you are using it in the right way - you could do it all in one step like
cdo -div -sub ua200.nc -timmean ua200.nc -timstd anom200.nc standardized.nc
Cheers,
J
RE: standarized anomaly - Added by Jaison-Thomas Ambadan about 11 years ago
Hi again,
sorry I made a mistake: it should be
cdo -div -sub ua200.nc -timmean ua200.nc -timstd -sub ua200.nc -timmean ua200.nc standardized.nc
It is better to do it in your way - in two steps - to avoid any confusion!
Cheers,
J
RE: standarized anomaly - Added by Noelia Otero about 11 years ago
Many thanks for your quick answer!
Cheers,
Noelia