Possbible bug - yseasmean and yseassum operators
Added by Guilherme Martins over 1 year ago
Hello, everyone. How are you?
I'm using the "yseasmean" operator to calculate seasonal climatology, and I noticed that the values are strange (very high for rainfall). I tested the "yseassum" operator, and to my surprise, the result was the same. Is it possible that there's a bug? I'm using cdo 2.0.3. I'm sending the file I'm using and an image of the commands used.
I'm using the command below:
cdo -s --no_history -yseasmean ERA5_LAND_mensal.nc climatologia1.nc
cdo -s --no_history -yseassum ERA5_LAND_mensal.nc climatologia2.nc
Best regards,
Guilherme Martins.
| example.PNG (40.5 KB) example.PNG | CDO output | ||
| ERA5_LAND_mensal.nc (24.2 MB) ERA5_LAND_mensal.nc | My NetCDF file |
Replies (3)
RE: Possbible bug - yseasmean and yseassum operators - Added by Uwe Schulzweida over 1 year ago
Hello Guilherme,
Yes, this error occurs only when the data has missing values. Therefore this error was not found by our test system. This bug (#10615) was fixed in CDO release 2.0.5.
Best regards,
Uwe
RE: Possbible bug - yseasmean and yseassum operators - Added by Guilherme Martins over 1 year ago
Dear Uwe,
Thank you very much for the explanation.
I love CDO, my favorite working tool. And now, with the integration with Python, it has become even better.
Do you plan to offer any training using CDO in the future?
Best regards,
Guilherme Martins.
RE: Possbible bug - yseasmean and yseassum operators - Added by Uwe Schulzweida over 1 year ago
Dear Guilherme,
We have no plans to offer CDO training, yet. Unfortunately, we have very limited resources for the CDO project.
But I think there is already a lot of material on the Internet. There are some tutorials about CDO on YouTube, also thanks to your contribution.
Best regards,
Uwe